License vs Assignment: What "Owning Your Masters" Actually Means in a Record Contract

Two Words That Change Everything

"The artist owns their masters" gets said about a lot of deals that don't actually deliver it. Whether you own your recordings comes down to one of two words in the grant of rights clause: assign or license.

An assignment transfers ownership of the copyright in the sound recording to the label. Unless there's a reversion clause, that transfer is permanent.

A license grants the label permission to exploit recordings you continue to own, for a defined term, territory, and set of rights. When the license ends, the permission ends.

Everything else in a record deal — royalty rate, advance, options — is negotiated on top of this foundation. Get this wrong and the rest barely matters.

What "Masters" Actually Means Now

Historically, "the masters" were physical tapes. Owning the tapes meant controlling the recording. Today the word means the copyright in the sound recording — the ℗ right, separate from the © in the underlying composition.

That copyright controls:

Reproduction (pressing, streaming, downloads)

Distribution

Derivative works (remixes, edits, samples)

Sync licensing to film, TV, games, and ads

Public performance in digital audio (SoundExchange income in the US)

Owning the master means owning the right to say yes or no to all of these, and to collect the income from them after whoever distributes the recording takes their fee.

Anatomy of an Assignment Clause

Assignment language is usually unmistakable once you know what to look for:

"Artist hereby irrevocably assigns to Company all right, title and interest, including the copyright, in and to the Masters, throughout the universe, in perpetuity."

Three phrases do the damage: irrevocably, throughout the universe, and in perpetuity. Together they mean forever, everywhere, no take-backs.

Some contracts go one step further and declare the recordings works made for hire. That's worse than an assignment. An assignment at least acknowledges you were the author and transferred your rights. Work-for-hire language claims the label was the author from the start, which (in the US) is designed to defeat your statutory termination right 35 years later.

Anatomy of a License Clause

"Artist grants to Company the exclusive right to exploit the Masters in the Territory during the Term and for a period of ten (10) years thereafter."

The key words are grants the exclusive right rather than assigns, and a defined period rather than perpetuity. The license is typically exclusive (you can't license the same recordings to anyone else during the term), but ownership stays with you.

What to check in a license deal:

License period. Measured from when? From release of each recording, from the end of the term, or from signing? "Ten years from release of the last album delivered" can be 15+ years for the first album.

Territory. "The world" is normal for a major; a smaller indie may only have reach in one region, and you should consider carving out territories they can't service.

Rights granted. Does the license cover sync? Sampling? Merchandise using the audio? Narrow it to what the label will actually do.

Post-term sell-off. Many licenses let the label keep selling existing stock for 6–12 months after expiry. Make sure that's limited to physical inventory and doesn't extend to digital.

Reversion mechanics. Even in a license, specify that on expiry the label must deliver masters, stems, artwork files, and metadata, and must instruct DSPs to take down or transfer the recordings.

The Hybrid: Assignment With Reversion

A lot of independent deals sit between the two: the label takes an assignment but agrees that ownership reverts to the artist on a trigger (fixed term, recoupment, or non-release). Functionally this is similar to a license, with one important difference: during the ownership period, the label can do things an owner can do — including sell your masters to someone else as part of a catalog deal. Make sure the reversion obligation binds any buyer.

Ownership Isn't Control

Owning your masters under a 15-year exclusive license still means the label controls them for 15 years. Conversely, a reversion clause in an assignment deal with a 7-year trigger gets you control sooner than a 20-year license.

So the questions to ask aren't just "do I own them?" but:

When do I control them?

What can the label do without my approval in the meantime? (Sync, samples, remixes, compilations — ask for approval rights over each.)

What happens to the recordings if the label is sold or goes under?

Distribution and Label Services Deals

In a distribution deal or label services deal, you should always own the masters outright. But read the grant anyway. Some distributor templates quietly take an assignment of any "edits, versions, or derivatives" created during the term, or an exclusive license that outlasts the actual service period by years. Owning the original while a distributor owns the radio edit is not full ownership.

How SoundDeal Handles This

SoundDeal classifies every recording agreement it analyzes as an assignment, a license, or an assignment with reversion, and reports the effective control period under each — not just the headline term. Perpetual assignments with no reversion are flagged as critical. License deals get checked for sell-off periods, territory, and post-expiry delivery obligations.

---

Does your contract say assign or license? Find out in 90 seconds →